No we still follow the rules and give them the fact that "nothing: is their submission. and the voting off session is the same unless I think of something else soonQuote:
Originally Posted by Assassin
Printable View
No we still follow the rules and give them the fact that "nothing: is their submission. and the voting off session is the same unless I think of something else soonQuote:
Originally Posted by Assassin
So does that mean they can still receive votes?
Thats a real awkward question right there, besides for the three of them, why would they vote? And for that matter, why haven't they voted yet? Deadfire, so according to the rules means that they will have to go through the same voting phase that the losers of this round do?Quote:
Originally Posted by XanBcoo
don't go jumping into conclusions now. though, there should be no excuse to why we didn't submit anything, let's just say we were all at a disagreement, then one thing led to another then basically it got hard to communicate with one another.Quote:
Originally Posted by masamuneehs
in my defense, it's a real bitch trying to keep in contact with those two. other than that, whatever happens, happens.
Who says they haven't voted yet? Voting for your own team when there's no submission would be pretty shameful. In all likelyhood they've voted for another team, if any.
I don't think it's that awkward. I considered voting for the Katons to see if it would be counted. They're still on the poll, so technically they could win if they got enough votes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaoskiddo
It's not like we didn't try, but I still hope we don't get more votes than the weakest (relatively speaking after the voting ends) of the real submissions. That would be an insult to those people who followed the rules and made the submission alright. And would certainly be nothing to be proud of for our team.Quote:
Originally Posted by XanBcoo
But honestly I don't see that happening in practice, so there's nothing to be concerned about.
But that brings us to the reason of no story submitted under your team?
Sorry to hear you like bad references.Quote:
Originally Posted by XanBcoo
With all the jokes, your eyes are probably tired by now eh?Quote:
Originally Posted by XanBcoo
Weren't these supposed to be like a "fanfiction" anyway?Quote:
Originally Posted by XanBcoo
So you wanted to see Itachi and his new hair? Or perhaps Lee's "lotus"? Pervert.Quote:
Originally Posted by splash
Last time I checked, we didn't lose anything, thank you come again.
VOTER, singular in meaning, I was just reffering to him and no one else. Get it right, and stop using out of context quotes to fulfill your inner need, it's just shameful.Quote:
You shouldn’t been speaking to your voters like that.
Don’t take it out on me. I would hate to see things get ugly. Its been so nice so far.
The comment you made was about mage and it wasn’t taken out of the context.
You can read the whole quote again here ……..
You are telling him to stfu.Quote:
Originally Posted by dragonrage
I agree with your above statement and I have said the same thing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jadugar
If you two ladies want to fight then I would gladly become a spectator. :p
Quote:
Originally Posted by XanBcoo
Still...it might've been more understandable had you said Dropouts instead of ours but a vote casted to Headshot seems like a waste when Fockers and Dropouts are neck and neck.
@ jadugar, yes i did tell him to STFU, but i did not tell everyone else to do so. Therefore i was speaking to one voter and not all.
This :
Quote:
Originally Posted by dragonrage
mage…………SHUT THE FUCK UP
does not equal this:Quote:
You shouldn’t been speaking to your voters like that.
Nor does it mean the same thing, atleast not the way you changed it, and since you did add changes to it, you are quoting something i did not say, atleast not in the way i said it.Quote:
Originally Posted by dragonrage
mage, since you are so dissatisfied, with all of our entire, I am giving this challenge to you. You have 3 weeks to complete the same event that we did. Lets see what such an overly criticial and abusive person can do. If you refuse, SHUT THE FUCK UP about it already.
OMG!
Jadugar has committed a sin
The gods are cursing him
The doors of heavens are closed for him now
He shall be sent to hell for all eternity
We shall not speak of him anymore
What has he done?
He has used the word “voters” instead of “voter”
Where did the “s” come from?
How could he be so careless?
Does he not know the rage of the Dragon?
The storm that is his inner child
All hell is now broke lose
Jadugar shall repent this sin with his death
EDIT :
http://img121.imageshack.us/img121/5861/reps8ri.jpg
I couldn't see the poll results when I voted. I voted for the submission that I thought was funniest, deal with it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaoskiddo
Edit: lol @ above.
Ah Jadugar,
you are ever so the humble scapegoat,
the under priviledged gotwoot user,
I blame you not.
But i do blame the society that you were raised in.
Yes, repent my fellow man.
And one day,
One day forgiveness shall come.
One day,
maybe.
Depends on what Xan believes in. Some voters will vote to get a result they want, others will vote for who they believe deserves their vote regardless of the standings. In a way, it's like someone who believes in the Green Party voting for the Green Party in a presidential election, even though it's obvious they won't win. Some people say that that is a waste, and some people respect it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaoskiddo
Still, a tiebreaking vote usually isn't onto a 3rd party.
CK, I don't think you understand what I meant, so I"ll use the present situation as an example instead of a presidential election. Let's pretend that XanBcoo "ranked" the submissions as such: Headshot, Sharkcoons, Katon, Fockers, Dropouts. As you've emphasized, his vote won't affect the results of the poll unless he votes the Fockers or Dropouts. So he can:
1. Vote for the Fockers because he "ranked" them higher and voting for any of the other three won't affect the outcome, or
2. Vote for Headshot because he has "ranked" it first.
Why choose (2)? Because that means your vote goes to what you believe in, rather than how you want to affect the results. Of course, all of this is assuming that XanBcoo saw the standings before casting his vote.
Note that the "ranking" I've given XanBcoo in this example is highly unlikely to be what he actually thought, if he is even the type of person to "rank" entries.
Bottom line: the guy votes for who he thinks deserves a vote (ignoring the standings).
Yes I understand that, yet I'm wondering what will happen in the case of a tie.