Thats cool. I'm just glad to hear some progress was made in the matter. I don't think I really put spoilers in just mentioned that the person could go to a spoiler page if they wanted to know more. But even I'm not sure on that. Atleast now thou other users won't get trapped into a rule that doesn't exist. Glad the matter was resolved. With abit more of renewed faith in the modding team for clearing everything up. Thanks.

On a sidenote even if rules are common sense there will always be people who think differently. Even one of your mods didn't know the rules and accused me of a rule that didn't exist which I got warned about. Just aslong as the mods take the users into consideration and the situation then things are good. You may also want to work on some way of keeping original posts in tact so that a deletion doesn't occur. I still think I didn't spoil something.

But with no post its my word against the mods. I'll do my best to save my posts in a text file for now. I don't want to have to be falsely accused of something again if I was indeed done so.

Look, even after being explained a few times, you still don't get it. All the mods are fully aware of all the rules, which are basic forum etiquette; a.k.a. common sense. The mod who made the comment about you breaking a rule twice is refering to you breaking the spoiler rule. I know you didn't do it twice on purpose, the second time was just due to bad timing between the mod-edit and yours. As I said above in your first post of this thread, it's only against the rules to edit over a mod-edit if you break a rule, then the post gets mod-edited (ie. spoiler taken out), then you re-edited it to the original post.

Also, I appreciate the advice about how to run the forums, but I think we can handle it.

GotWoot Moderator