Originally posted by: Mut@chiOkay, then what do you suppose that UK does after gathering enough information and evidence? Should they... send the bad guys an angry letter? I'm not sure how a country can 'apprehend' the bad guys without invading another country, and without it going into war since that country being invaded isn't just gonna bend over.
Assuming that a country would willingly shelter them that is. And if a country does, then it's up to diplomacy to solve it. Yes, diplomacy. Neither UK nor US can barge into a country ignoring all its laws to apprehend criminals at their own leisure. That's just how the world works. I'm still not seeing how I'm being hypocritical here.
Originally posted by: Mut@chi
Starting out the sentence with 'Germany' is my mistake. I meant Nazi every time I said Germany. The Nazi's ideal is no different than a terrorist's ideal. Granted there are still Nazis out there, but is it on the same scale of back in WWII? No, and since it isn't, what we did was right.
Still doesn't change the fact that it's still a living and breathing ideal. What you did was crush Nazi Germany, not Nazism. What you did in Iraq was crush Iraq, not terrorism. Do you see the difference here? An ideal isn't something you can touch. Nazi Germany was a faction in a war.
Originally posted by: Mut@chi
It has worked plenty of times.
Temporarily at best.