Mut is Banned

[Terracosmo]

No, this forum needs Mut.

Yes, his ban was justified. What he did rendered a ban. HOWEVER, Mut had a reason to do it, and I think it's unfair to group him up as a basic member when it comes to those things. Okay now I'm practically saying that "since Mut is a veteran, he can do things that the rest of you can't". But so what? It might be "wrong", but that's how I see things. We (people like Mut and me) have been around longer. We have done things for the forums. Contributed. We DESERVE to do things that the rest of you don't. We all know that Mut isn't a stupid spammer at heart. He's Mut, and banning him for being Mut is just silly. That's how I see things.

Edit: Glad you found my spoof of you funny, Bud [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-tongue.gif[/img]

[Deblas]

Originally posted by: Terracosmo
No, this forum needs Mut.

Yes, his ban was justified. What he did rendered a ban. HOWEVER, Mut had a reason to do it, and I think it's unfair to group him up as a basic member when it comes to those things. Okay now I'm practically saying that "since Mut is a veteran, he can do things that the rest of you can't". But so what? It might be "wrong", but that's how I see things. We (people like Mut and me) have been around longer. We have done things for the forums. Contributed. We DESERVE to do things that the rest of you don't. We all know that Mut isn't a stupid spammer at heart. He's Mut, and banning him for being Mut is just silly. That's how I see things.

Ahh. The old Veteran vs. Non-Veteran fight. All to common. While using the old "I've been here the longest so that makes it eligible" excuse, the veterans feel they should have special previleges to bypass any regulations and to recognize themselves as being above others while the non-veterans feel it's unfair to give them any special treatment just because they've been here the longest. And because the veterans have already formed a close relationship between each other, they stick together and close their doors for the newbies and label them as below them. It's only natural to defend Veterans with Veterans and Non-Veterans with Non-Veterans.

[Terracosmo]

Originally posted by: Deblas

Originally posted by: Terracosmo
No, this forum needs Mut.

Yes, his ban was justified. What he did rendered a ban. HOWEVER, Mut had a reason to do it, and I think it's unfair to group him up as a basic member when it comes to those things. Okay now I'm practically saying that "since Mut is a veteran, he can do things that the rest of you can't". But so what? It might be "wrong", but that's how I see things. We (people like Mut and me) have been around longer. We have done things for the forums. Contributed. We DESERVE to do things that the rest of you don't. We all know that Mut isn't a stupid spammer at heart. He's Mut, and banning him for being Mut is just silly. That's how I see things.

Ahh. The old Veteran vs. Non-Veteran fight. All to common. While using the old "I've been here the longest so that makes it eligible" excuse, the veterans feel they should have special previleges to bypass any regulations and to recognize themselves as being above others while the non-veterans feel it's unfair to give them any special treatment just because they've been here the longest. And because the veterans have already formed a close relationship between each other, they stick together and close their doors for the newbies and label them as below them. It's only natural to defend Veterans with Veterans and Non-Veterans with Non-Veterans.

Ehh... okay? Re-read my post. And don't categorize what I write.
Nowhere did I state that we bypass all regulations.

[Deblas]

Originally posted by: Terracosmo

Originally posted by: Deblas

Originally posted by: Terracosmo
No, this forum needs Mut.

Yes, his ban was justified. What he did rendered a ban. HOWEVER, Mut had a reason to do it, and I think it's unfair to group him up as a basic member when it comes to those things. Okay now I'm practically saying that "since Mut is a veteran, he can do things that the rest of you can't". But so what? It might be "wrong", but that's how I see things. We (people like Mut and me) have been around longer. We have done things for the forums. Contributed. We DESERVE to do things that the rest of you don't. We all know that Mut isn't a stupid spammer at heart. He's Mut, and banning him for being Mut is just silly. That's how I see things.

Ahh. The old Veteran vs. Non-Veteran fight. All to common. While using the old "I've been here the longest so that makes it eligible" excuse, the veterans feel they should have special previleges to bypass any regulations and to recognize themselves as being above others while the non-veterans feel it's unfair to give them any special treatment just because they've been here the longest. And because the veterans have already formed a close relationship between each other, they stick together and close their doors for the newbies and label them as below them. It's only natural to defend Veterans with Veterans and Non-Veterans with Non-Veterans.

Ehh... okay? Re-read my post. And don't categorize what I write.
Nowhere did I state that we bypass all regulations.

Well since this is a because mut shitposted and went against the rules so he got a tempban thread. And you think his ban was "silly" because he was just being himself. And given the fact that mut is a veteran. One can only assume that your line of "We DESERVE to do things that the rest of you don't" means that it is allright for the veterans to not follow the rules.

So, if I got it wrong. What did you mean then?

[Terracosmo]

Originally posted by: Deblas

Originally posted by: Terracosmo

Originally posted by: Deblas

Originally posted by: Terracosmo
No, this forum needs Mut.

Yes, his ban was justified. What he did rendered a ban. HOWEVER, Mut had a reason to do it, and I think it's unfair to group him up as a basic member when it comes to those things. Okay now I'm practically saying that "since Mut is a veteran, he can do things that the rest of you can't". But so what? It might be "wrong", but that's how I see things. We (people like Mut and me) have been around longer. We have done things for the forums. Contributed. We DESERVE to do things that the rest of you don't. We all know that Mut isn't a stupid spammer at heart. He's Mut, and banning him for being Mut is just silly. That's how I see things.

Ahh. The old Veteran vs. Non-Veteran fight. All to common. While using the old "I've been here the longest so that makes it eligible" excuse, the veterans feel they should have special previleges to bypass any regulations and to recognize themselves as being above others while the non-veterans feel it's unfair to give them any special treatment just because they've been here the longest. And because the veterans have already formed a close relationship between each other, they stick together and close their doors for the newbies and label them as below them. It's only natural to defend Veterans with Veterans and Non-Veterans with Non-Veterans.

Ehh... okay? Re-read my post. And don't categorize what I write.
Nowhere did I state that we bypass all regulations.

Well since this is a because mut shitposted and went against the rules so he got a tempban thread. And you think his ban was "silly" because he was just being himself. And given the fact that mut is a veteran. One can only assume that your line of "We DESERVE to do things that the rest of you don't" means that it is allright for the veterans to not follow the rules.

So, if I got it wrong. What did you mean then?

Well if you want to interpret it that way then fine, I basically just meant that since Mut is, and has always been, a contributing poster - it's normal that he has a few advantages. If you were the boss of a company, and you had to fire one of two workers, which one would you fire... the average Joe who hardly posts, or the contributing worker who has always given his all for the company?

Do you understand now?

Note: This is of course a far-fetched comparison, but I'm just trying to make you understand my train of thought.

[Deblas]

Originally posted by: Terracosmo

Originally posted by: Deblas

Originally posted by: Terracosmo

Originally posted by: Deblas

Originally posted by: Terracosmo
No, this forum needs Mut.

Yes, his ban was justified. What he did rendered a ban. HOWEVER, Mut had a reason to do it, and I think it's unfair to group him up as a basic member when it comes to those things. Okay now I'm practically saying that "since Mut is a veteran, he can do things that the rest of you can't". But so what? It might be "wrong", but that's how I see things. We (people like Mut and me) have been around longer. We have done things for the forums. Contributed. We DESERVE to do things that the rest of you don't. We all know that Mut isn't a stupid spammer at heart. He's Mut, and banning him for being Mut is just silly. That's how I see things.

Ahh. The old Veteran vs. Non-Veteran fight. All to common. While using the old "I've been here the longest so that makes it eligible" excuse, the veterans feel they should have special previleges to bypass any regulations and to recognize themselves as being above others while the non-veterans feel it's unfair to give them any special treatment just because they've been here the longest. And because the veterans have already formed a close relationship between each other, they stick together and close their doors for the newbies and label them as below them. It's only natural to defend Veterans with Veterans and Non-Veterans with Non-Veterans.

Ehh... okay? Re-read my post. And don't categorize what I write.
Nowhere did I state that we bypass all regulations.

Well since this is a because mut shitposted and went against the rules so he got a tempban thread. And you think his ban was "silly" because he was just being himself. And given the fact that mut is a veteran. One can only assume that your line of "We DESERVE to do things that the rest of you don't" means that it is allright for the veterans to not follow the rules.

So, if I got it wrong. What did you mean then?

Well if you want to interpret it that way then fine, I basically just meant that since Mut is, and has always been, a contributing poster - it's normal that he has a few advantages. If you were the boss of a company, and you had to fire one of two workers, which one would you fire... the average Joe who hardly posts, or the contributing worker who has always given his all for the company?

Do you understand now?

Note: This is of course a far-fetched comparison, but I'm just trying to make you understand my train of thought.

Ohh. Okay I get it now. That's what happens in the web. You sometimes intepret something diferrent from what it originally meant.