1 Question though, who is the creepy dude with ahole on his stomach and green hair at 01:12/24:34?
Edited by Budweineken to remove the spoiler discussion in this thread
1 Question though, who is the creepy dude with ahole on his stomach and green hair at 01:12/24:34?
Edited by Budweineken to remove the spoiler discussion in this thread
Last edited by Munsu; Thu, 08-24-2006 at 05:36 AM.
Heh Cloud doing a Shy Kuukaku rocks XD
Removed spoilers
Last edited by Munsu; Thu, 08-24-2006 at 05:29 AM.
Who is this charachter? And what makes you think him appearing means the fillers might end?
EDIT: HOLY SHIT WTF IS HE DOING THERE!!!!!!!!!! (Rhetorical)
Last edited by Yukimura; Wed, 08-23-2006 at 03:43 PM.
"who is this char" is manga spoiling
Removed Spoilers
Last edited by Munsu; Thu, 08-24-2006 at 05:29 AM.
Yes I'd like to point out here guys thatOriginally Posted by darkshadow
If you refer to any person, place, event, etc that is in the manga and has not been shown or revealed in full. You will get a warning for that post.
This is the warning, let it be writen and let it be told
If needed discuss your manga facts and other trivia in the Manga board
Last edited by Munsu; Thu, 08-24-2006 at 05:30 AM.
image fail!
Now hold on DF, that dude did in fact appear in an episode of Bleach the anime and speculation on him should be allowed. If ds hadn't blurted it out then people would have been free to speculate to their hearts content about who he was. Although it's safe to assume that a guy shown in the intro to Bleach that hasn't been seen before in an episode is probably a charachter who hasn't been introduced yet. Case in point, Byakuya was in the original opening, but didn't appear untll ~20 episodes in. Would noticing him have been a spoiler too?
Off Topic Addendum:
The wording of that rule is kinda screwy and should be updated. Saying 'not been shown or revealed in full makes very little sense. Obviously being revealed in full requires being shown, so it's like saying if A or (A and B) which logically boils down to if not A. Additionally , what does 'revealed in full' really mean? Does it mean a fully visible representation of the charachter or do we have to wait untill we find out the charachters favorite food and or 5 year plan? It's sort of ambiguous.
Example: one of the last Naruto eps pre filler showed several people in a shadow/staticy environment talking about something i don't remember. I would think they haven't been revealed in full, but they have been shown. I think the spirit of the rule would want us to not talk about them if they were from the manga but from the wording of that rule it shouldn't be a problem, because the or says that the lesser condition is sufficient to avoid the classification of spoiler. I just think the rule should be made clear, because with all the non thinkers that might come around these board there should be as little room for doubt as possible. Who wants to get join a forum where they get banned because the rules were worded poorly and their post happened to fall on the wrong side of a mod's discretion?
Yuki, speculation is allowed, its just not allowed to say anything that is already a fact in the manga about those certain chars.
Go ahead and speculate all you want, as long as no manga reader comes here and spoils it for all of the non manga readers, that's actually the reason i posted, to prevent people from banning themselfs :P.
On Topic:
this ep was actually pretty nice also, golden cup was sweet once again and the preview made ep95 seem like one of the greatest eps in bleach history.
>_> i'm actually liking this filler stuff now <_<
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
