View Poll Results: it's (a)?

Voters
37. You may not vote on this poll
  • Justice!!

    27 72.97%
  • Discrase!!

    10 27.03%
Results 1 to 20 of 38

Thread: Saddam Dies

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by Super5
    @Assassin: He's lucky to be hanged. Traditionally executions in Muslim nations are public beheading - he got off easy in that respect.
    Being hanged was the only way he didnt want to be executed in, due to an extra amount of humiliation and disgrace being associated with it. (Atleast that's what an article i read said)

  2. #2
    Moderator Emeritus masamuneehs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    a fountain pourin' like an avalanche, comin' down the mountain
    Age
    39
    Posts
    3,874
    it ain't pretty...
    Cellphone camera recording of the execution

    you also must be a registered youtube member over a certain age to view this particular video. There are other ones out there, stuff broadcast on TV and that, but this is what I've been told is "the real" leaked recording.

    Humans are different from animals. We must die for a reason. Now is the time for us to regulate ourselves and reclaim our dignity. The one who holds endless potential and displays his strength and kindness to the world. Only mankind has God, a power that allows us to go above and beyond what we are now, a God that we call "possibility".

  3. #3
    It ain't right, death penalty seriously ... We're in 2007, we're supposed to be the most evolued self conscient being in the universe. And what ... Rope + Hasty Trial + Hatred = Justice Justice ? Don't kid me ... Revenge ... maybe ... or maybe worst, occidentals silencing the old man. Ok, the guy was "Evil", killing people and such ...
    But "We" did support him, selling weapons, technology, ...
    To superpowers the man was an embarassing person, not a threat (Military speaking), not a "I-Gotta-take-the-man-down-for-democracy-and-human-rights".

    Just guess what would have happened if Saddam had an A-bomb or decent weaponery ...
    No invasion, no embargo, no International indignation, ...

    " The Saddam Evil Dictator is slaying people for fun in his counrty, we gotta take him down, bring a rope and some missiles ... "
    " No can't do ... He got some Massive Dest... err ... We just cannot barge in a sovereign state like that, if you got a complain ask the UN "

    It's no matter of justice anyway
    Powerfull Third Party + Greed + Paranoid + Weakened state + Unpopular leader * Crimes = Irak-like scenario.

    The result ? More Ennemy Combattants ...
    "Man gimme some ... Extra clips, gotta avenge the old man, don't hang the representation of my country."

    I don't mean that Saddam's vanishing isn't a good thing, I just say, when you bring the shit elsewhere, unless you suppress all witnesses, the shit will come right back, amplified.

    Come on ... No need of the "World Police" we need a mediator.

  4. #4
    Benevolent Dictator
    complich8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    some terminal somewhere
    Age
    44
    Posts
    2,189
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Inazuma
    It ain't right, death penalty seriously ... We're in 2007, we're supposed to be the most evolued self conscient being in the universe. And what ... Rope + Hasty Trial + Hatred = Justice Justice ?
    Universe? Probably not. Planet? Probably. But just think, a mere couple hundred years ago, the most "civilized" civilizations on the planet and the religion of "love and forgiveness" tortured and killed thousands of people for their refusal to adopt their beliefs (ie: the Inquisition). A hanging death is at least mercifully quick.

    More to the point, if he had been left alive, someone would have killed him anyway. Why do you think he was living in a hole? Hiding from us? Not so much that as hiding from his opponents when we broke his power.

    Even more to the point, his trial and his execution were both orchestrated and played by Iraqis. We took away his power and arrested him, but they're the ones who decided whether, when, where, why and how. So there's a certain element of "not our fault" in that.

    I'd rather see him hanged in a state-run execution (even an unprofessional one like the one he got) than shivved in a prison camp though.

    Don't kid me ... Revenge ... maybe ... or maybe worst, occidentals silencing the old man. Ok, the guy was "Evil", killing people and such ...
    But "We" did support him, selling weapons, technology, ...
    To superpowers the man was an embarassing person, not a threat (Military speaking), not a "I-Gotta-take-the-man-down-for-democracy-and-human-rights".
    A little incoherent here. But you're right, we did indeed support him once. In retrospect, it was a bad idea. Our participation in the Korean war and Vietnam was also probably a bad idea. And our arming and training Afghanistan to fight against the Soviets... just as bad. But again, while the US deposed him, we didn't execute him. His own people did that.

    (incoherent rantings removed)
    Come on ... No need of the "World Police" we need a mediator.
    Incoherent rantings aside, the current conflict in Iraq was something of an inevitability. The reason Saddam was so successful in ruling Iraq was that he built what amounts to a personality cult around himself, and followed an approach of modernization to try to unite people under a modern standard of living. The mere process of invading invalidated much of that modernization, and deposing the iron-fisted dictator in an environment rife with factionalism certainly seeded the current situation to bloom into a lovely bloody war.

    Iraq doesn't need a mediator. They need a dictator to sweep in, improve lives, and crush opposition to him. Much like Saddam and the Baath party did for a quarter of a century.

    It's a nice high-minded ideal to think that democracy works everywhere. But it doesn't. Mediating conflicts doesn't work when all involved parties have no faith in the mediation process and are unwilling to compromise. When none of the participants is willing to give the slightest bit of ground to the other, and perceives the other as being the same way, it's just not going anywhere.
    Last edited by complich8; Wed, 01-03-2007 at 07:27 PM.

  5. #5
    Note : "We", I was thinking about the French Governement, that used to sell every second hand weaponery to Iraq (And Other countries).

  6. #6
    not over yet Death BOO Z's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Israel
    Age
    37
    Posts
    4,403
    if you don't trust the prison system, it doesn't mean you need to kill the criminals to make sure they don't commit crime again.

    What happened to Saddam isn't justice, it isn't even close to it, but it's probably the cloesest thing that we'll see in this situation.
    not that it'll do any good, five years from now we'll be missing him, but going into iraq was still the right thing to do, becuse one day, after Iraq gets in order (under the rulership of some other dictator) and falls again, the Iraqi people (A false state, by the way, we'll have to wait and see which national groups emerge in the next few years) will have a decent soceity, that will be good both for them and for the rest of the world.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •