Naruto 346

[Munsu]

Umm... OK? I got that already. You've posted this a million times already. You still used irrelevant incorrectly the 2nd time stating your statement/opinion/post whatever you want to call it made mine irrelevant. That's impossible.

Again, you're not reading carefully and taking everything out of context. I won't argue about this shit anymore.

Relevant to a different arguement. Not mine.

I actually was the first one to bring the curse seal's effect on Sasuke and you used your statement to counter it, so it is relevant the whole argument.

Here's the problem with yours and others posts against mine. They were all DEDUCTIVE. "I'm right, so you're wrong." I told you multiple times to look up INDUCTIVE and you just fire back with faulty deductive reasoning. That doesn't work. I really don't give a shit if my arguement is right or wrong because it can't be either. It's strong or weak, and you can argue it's weak. I have no problem with that. You guys take it all personal that someone has a different opinion. "WAAH WAAH! You're wrong! I'm right!" All this blather you've guys been putting has been completely irrelevant. I stated multiple times that I'm arguing inductively. That means no right or wrong. That means there can be multiple arguements and possibilities. One does not necessarily have to negate the other. You guys are just hell-bent on making someone wrong. Which to me was quite amusing. I enjoyed your ignorant arrogance, but your next victims probably wouldn't, so I'm enlightening you. Hopefully next time you guys will actually look up words you try to use and do some enjoyable INDUCTIVE reasoning. Deducing is fine, but it's boring.

You using inductive reasoning is fine. Whatever type of argument and/or reasoning process you're using, the strength and accuracy of your conclusion will be just as accurate as the premises used. The premises you used are very weak and THAT'S ALL I'VE BEEN SAYING, so your conclusion is weak. And yes, I've proven or made a VERY STRONG CASE as to why your premise is flawed and everyone here agrees, but you because you're incapable of understanding. You using INDUCTIVE reasoning doesn't excuse you from using crappy flawed premises to prove your conclusion. The major difference between detuctive and inductive is that the reasoning behind inductive the premises used may support the conclusion, but not necessarily making that conclusion true, while in deductive reasoning if the premises are true then the conclusion should be true. I've never attacked your type of reasoning, but I did attack your premise and I pretty much showed how it's flawed hence making your conclusion flawed. Once again, using inductive reasoning doesn't excuse you for using bad premises to support your conclusion. So, if the premises used are bad then your conclusion is bad.