Quote Originally Posted by DB_Hunter
Dude... this isn't scientific! At best its a correlation (and I use the word loosley here) of some observations. There is no control sample, no repeated results, no controlling of surrounding conditions, no varying of one variable whilst controlling others etc etc etc. You can't analyse something like this scientifically.

Besides, even if we were to agree on this being a generalisation, the article is still wrong as it is asserting this the norm worldwide. Thats like saying condition x applies to everyone in the world, except anyone who does not live in a certain town in a certain state in a certain country. Its absurd.
I don't get where you get your reasoning from. The article adresses human as a species, not each individual person. You are still human regardless of what country/town you are from.

Quote Originally Posted by Carnage
El_Boss you keep on spelling everything wrong. Its "underestimate" not "inderestimate"
Dammit... but that can be fixed though.

Quote Originally Posted by Animeniax
Fun read. I thought you misspelled "pncorrect" on purpose, kind of like "pwned".
I shouldn't have said anything :P