Quote Originally Posted by UChessmaster
When was it proved that he lied on anything at all?
Well, Minato confirmed that Madara was indeed controlling the Kyuubi when it attacked the village sixteen years ago. Madara denied any involvement and claimed the attack was a random act of nature.

I'm not really one to support or criticize the theories people like to throw out. Occasionally we may get a few that have enough evidence supporting them for me to entertain the idea no matter how unlikely they seem. Others are so incredibly absurd that I wonder if the person who first proposed the idea ever actually took the time to think about what they were posting.

Either way I usually go along with the general consensus unless I feel that there is no one offering an opposing opinion. Undoubtedly the threads are here just for us to discuss such things but this Danzo is Madara thing is just really tiring. Whenever a new chapter is released someone will of course scour the chapter looking for something they can present as evidence supporting the theory and then someone else will of course have to demonstrate how said evidence proves absolutely nothing and it'll go back and forth until a new chapter is released when it would begin all over again.

I suppose it's not nearly as incessant as I am portraying it but it is still just as annoying. If Danzo is Madara we'll find out eventually, if Danzo is not Madara we'll find out. Let's just stopping talking about it, for a little while at least.

That being said, I suppose I should state my own opinion right. Personally I don't think the Danzo is Madara theory is as improbable as most make it out to be. I just really dislike the idea because I think it would be lazy, uninspired writing on Kishimoto's part and if the theory proves to be true it would only serve to further tarnish Itachi and I'm not going to be a part of that.

And yes I realize I just finished asking you guys to stop talking about it