and no, these 2 are not reporters
so they have no cameras or whatever
u can clearly see the RPG a little bit later.
and its unimportant whether its a direct threat to the helicopter, a guy with an RPG is obviously a threat to the ground forces.
not saying I understand why they aimed for the people without guns too though (they tried to kill everyone, even the guys without weapons.. u can clearly see that)
I don't understand one thing at all though
when that wounded guy crawled away, he didn't shoot because he had no weapon.. "come on.. all u have to do is pick up a weapon" its not like he cared for that when he began shooting the crowd.
and then the van appears and the guys in the van tried to help/get the wounded guy away from the scene
*WHY* does he want to shoot them? they were not carrying any weapons.
I mean its like he's saying
"ok he has no weapon, I won't shoot him"
Van appears:
"OH NO fuck you, u won't!" *rattarattaratta*
this is so wrong.
to be honest I can understand why he said that...This was completely uncalled for, even going as far as saying "shouldn't have brought their kids to battle then" as if somehow that makes it alright.
i guess...to stay mental stable u have to say such things in war
Reply With Quote