wow, awesome post man, thanks. You've given me a lot to think about.
I can, and do, watch plenty of things I don't agree with. Honestly, I take a fairly malleable "ironist" approach to my own moral worldview. Literature and movies/tv (including SnK) are one such place to find moral redescriptions or critiques or alternative views. However, when encountering such moral worldviews, I try not to outright accept or reject anything "i just don't agree with," but rather I try to critique it and make an assessment. I mean, at some point it's really about a certain inward resonance. And when watching a show and running into a lot of dissonance, and I constantly relate what is being presented to other negatively viewed experiences or ideas, then it just becomes uncomfortable to keep listening to the show. I guess on some level I do have trouble sitting through stuff I disagree with, but I think your agnostic/faith example is different from what I'm trying to say here. I did sit through 13 episodes after all, so it's not like I immediately shut the thing out. But it just got to the point where disagreeable worldviews were draining out the enjoyment.
Like I said in my first post, the whole thing is like one giant oozing existential crisis. That stuff can be cool sometimes. Maybe I'm just not getting into the fantasy appropriately, and am having trouble relating to whats happening. I dunno. I just want my angst-filled teens to be separate and put off to the side.
Like I said, I'm not about only seeking out things I agree with beforehand. Worldview pretty malleable. Those other "mature" shows with questionable morals and themes are usually totally open to my viewing/critiquing, but again, it's all about the assessment of what's being portrayed. It's not just about "questionable" as in it questions some really conservative worldview or something, but it's about the inward resonance and ability to withstand scrutiny (or even really just what the upshot of such scrutiny is--"withstand" isn't really what I mean, but it's more about examining them and seeing where such an examination goes).
But you also seem to be saying what Kraco said, which puts the show in a new light for me. The idea that the show is supposed to be viewed negatively I think is a really cool way to approach it. So we're more watching Orwell's 1984 rather than some army ad glorifying the awesomeness of violence. Redescribed this way, I might actually finish out the series.
Yeah, I really don't like Eren, and you basically nailed down way. But I will agree that it is better to look at the characters with more complexity rather than trying to write them off on oversimplifications. (But still, I do have a problem with Mikasa's psychopathy).
wait, were such things present in the first 13 episodes? I mean, many of my complaints could be redescribed to fit such terms, as they're all malleable and subjective concepts. But yeah, I'm probably oversimplifying and emphasizing the negative at the expense of the good (the existentialism really does drain everything else out imo)