Are you refering to this?:

Why do you assume that maintaining life in a bisected body would not cost that much energy. Did you miss when I said we have no idea how much it would cost to sustain life in two halves of a bisected body but I am assuming it would be more than was needed to heal a stab wound.
"Why do you assume" goes both ways, cept your assumption is really stupid; you really think it would require more energy to stop someone from bleeding out and keep the heart going than it would to actively repair and restore the damaged or missing tissue from a stab wound?

If you were refering to some other argument you made you'll have to point it out for me, or just stop writing instruction manuals in the future.