Sigh, yeah. I'll see if anyone comes along who happens to agree with me and can do a better job of explaining because this is just going to keep going in circles. Call it semantics but we are arguing what constitutes reasonable, just like before I made the point that Mfauli has a very different definition of what constitutes parody. Mfauli has been going on and on about Saitama's strength and saying that the whole thing is unreasonable, because no one else could attain Saitama's strength. I am simply pointing out that at any point someone else can be introduced with equally incredulous strength. You also used the word consistent which I take issue with because strength in DBZ and Bleach, the two examples you used, are anything but consistent. You seemed to be siding with Mfauli on that issue which I could not understand.
This is and has been the crux of Mfauli's argument since his very first post in this thread and this is where I am saying he is wrong. Saitama's origin in no way precludes there being other strong characters because according to Saitama himself push-ups is a valid explanation within the universe's context.