The only thing that is funny is your duality, as always, because in every other show you would complain about "letting the evil guy" stay alive or letting him take advantage of the situation, or trying to talk it out when the enemy is right in front of himOriginally Posted by MFauli
People don't start acting on only 100% guarantees. Not sure what the problem here is in a world where death is around every corner.
He asked questions, Rudeus made statements and also asked questions, he got information, he decided this information puts Rudeus as someone not to be trusted and makes quick work of him. Not sure why you just decided to completely ignore their conversation that made Rudeus look weird as hell (not just to Orsted, but to his companions as well). So much information was given there but you chose to ignore it I guess, just because it hasn't been said in words?
He is obviously a character that makes decision quickly and fast. Why? We don't know yet, maybe because he probably has made the experience that this is necessary or simply because he doesn't know any better as I could imagine that when the common exchange with other beings, even as strong as the Sperd is: "DON'T COME ANY CLOSER, WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU, GO AWAY" or when people run away from him all the time, I doubt he gets to know people properly?
If he is at "war" with Man-God, I don't see why he should leave the enemy alive in the first place. Does it really matter if Rudeus is working willingly or unwillingly for the enemy?
Orsted doesn't claim to be a good person or even a good guy. He could be evil or the good guy, he could be as mad as Laplace, Laplace on the other hand might not even be bad, other people tell us he is bad... but does that even amount to anything?
Again, we have absolutely no background information of what has happened to him or who he actually is.
If we already knew, this would be extremely boring by comparison. Getting to see a character and being able to judge him properly in the first 2 minutes of a show is a disappointment, nothing more.
It seems like you forgot that a good character in a story doesn't always have to act correctly or in a way you would do. Someone isn't "dumb" just because he acts rashly. Someone isn't dumb when he kills someone instead of knocking him out or whatever, neither is it necessarily evil. We know too little of the world, the characters, and the whole situation to make any decent judgement here.
We don't even know why he is where he is because he didn't start in an icy region, he was in some kind of Desert-Mountain area - alone as well - the first time we saw him in the show, as far as I remember.
Reply With Quote