Sigs are in again

[Assertn]

a well done animated sig isnt the least bit annoying, and can still be done well within the size requirements if you know what you're doing. I usually make a small animation that lasts a second and then stays still for maybe 5 or so seconds.....but anybody who finds a name that fades once in a while or even a constant animation that FITS as a loop (i.e. a loop of a person walking) as annoying has issues. Sigs are meant to be unique and interesting, if people are limited by their means of expression, then whats the point?

[itsgalf]

hmm, my old sig met the requirements anyways...so I'm not bothered

[Inquisitor77]

"Sigs are meant to be unique and interesting, if people are limited by their means of expression, then whats the point?"


That is by far the most consistent and coherent logical argument I have ever seen in my entire existence.

Yes, I was being sarcastic.

[Assertn]

Originally posted by: Inquisitor77
"Sigs are meant to be unique and interesting, if people are limited by their means of expression, then whats the point?"


That is by far the most consistent and coherent logical argument I have ever seen in my entire existence.

Yes, I was being sarcastic.

wow, so like, do you just respond to a valid point with an opinion opposite of your own and then slap the all-purpose sarcastic tag at the end?
Cause, i fail to understand what makes my argument NOT consistent and coherent.

oh and welcome to the forums btw, im sure you'll contribute some extremely inspiring posts to our threads
yes, I was ALSO being sarcastic [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]

[Poiple Weezard]

I agree with BurnHavoc that animated sigs are more annoying and distracting than any other type. In fact, I dislike most animated images on the web, from little gifs to ad-banners, they are all freaking annoying.