well then please try explaining from where you gathered your logic
at what point did the manga ever point anywhere remotly close to that lee was a natural at drunken boxing
the name:not really based after anything but bruce lee
and his taijutsu reflects that
(sorry to be so harsh but im gonna pick apart your thought process)
Ch 210, pg 19
LOOOOOOL
yea NOW we know hes good with drunken fist
but the way you put it was like you have alwasy know it
rofl,your asking the wrong person to ask about basics of logic(common sense), I dont determin whats logic or not but i do follow the same concept that has been established. do you understand 1+1=2 ?Originally posted by: sangai sakusei
well then please try explaining from where you gathered your logic
at what point did the manga ever point anywhere remotly close to that lee was a natural at drunken boxing
the name:not really based after anything but bruce lee
and his taijutsu reflects that
(sorry to be so harsh but im gonna pick apart your thought process)
Yes I didnt talk to kishimoto .i thought you wouldve figure that bout now .So direct proof from kishimoto should be out of the question, right? or no?So whats left for proof? define proof for me ,if there was foreshadowing scene is that a proof or is it a coincedence?my onpinion was based upon usin simple logic. Rocklee + Tajitsu= planned out drunken fist. from spectator view who is analyzing the current events, that i see variables coinciding each other. was it a coincedence? , ill give the benefit of the doubt to Kishimoto that it was planned out. But it seems giving credit with enthusiam toward Kishimoto that lil kids have the urge to give negative feed back, asking wheres the proof?
sorry not be so harsh,You cant pick apart my thought process if ur IQ =20 and 2+0= it doesnt equal 20 in my logic
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote