not necessarily, it just needs to be tweaked to say "ANBU has POTENTIALLY better quality"
since higher bitrates mean higher capabilities for flawless sound/video.....
but the real test is the skill of the encoder
not necessarily, it just needs to be tweaked to say "ANBU has POTENTIALLY better quality"
since higher bitrates mean higher capabilities for flawless sound/video.....
but the real test is the skill of the encoder
10/4/04 - 8/20/07
AonE's translations were more accurate to the Japanese. ANBU made some inappropriate simplifications...
but I did see choppiness with the video
The artificats I kept on seeing in the AonE encode got really annoying so I'm sticking to ANBU for this release... I'll probably be getting both and doing a compare to see which one I'll keep...
Translations were about equal (none were better then the other, just different but the a hole word in ANBU was a bit of a turn off...) Audio was about equal as well.. It really did come down to those artifacts in the end... I could try another player or whatever but my hardware player seems them and I cant do anything about that
like what?Originally posted by: virmaior
AonE's translations were more accurate to the Japanese. ANBU made some inappropriate simplifications...
Mgslee: does profanity turn you off? well then it seems its true what they say about how its impossible to satisfy everyone, since most people prefer the profanity over watered down versions. The point is that manda is supposed to be short tempered and demanding, and I think anbu covered that better than aone did
10/4/04 - 8/20/07
ihave only seen the aone version
so can't say which one is better
although the aone version rocks
nice subbing