Results 1 to 20 of 93

Thread: The Ultimate Sack thread

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    RE: The Ultimate Sack thread

    Yes I'd have to agree on that also. You gotta post something more insightful than "amen"

  2. #2

    RE: The Ultimate Sack thread

    Ironically jing, BOARD_of_command, your statements could have been more succinctly stated as "I agree with Mut@t@" which would be against his suggested rule in both the original statement and its revised context. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img] In it's current form, it only breaks the revised suggestion that Kagari agrees with.

    I'm not trying to pick a fight or add to a fire though, I only want to say that it calls up a thought. People agreeing and disagreeing is not uncommon, and when coming to a place to express your opinion, it seems sensible. And also gives an idea on how liked or disliked an opinion is.

    Is it really so terrible to hear 'I agree' rather than having to justify it with a different comment or a description of why you agree? Even those two words, though small, can be a contribution to the conversation, as it expresses an opinion and stays on topic.

    That said, if the law of the land says otherwise, so be it.

  3. #3

    RE: The Ultimate Sack thread

    this sucks... i love saying i agree...

    since... i agree with what ur saying now

    lol i think that is a bad idea... gives me the "rebel" notion to post a topic in reverse language...

    for example, if i wanted to say "Sakura is smart" , I guess i'll have to post the topic as "Sakura is dumb". or else no one could really contribute to the discussion!

    I mean, who really wants to see their thread have no response? *sniff*

  4. #4

    RE: The Ultimate Sack thread

    Originally posted by: Ponderer
    Ironically jing, BOARD_of_command, your statements could have been more succinctly stated as "I agree with Mut@t@" which would be against his suggested rule in both the original statement and its revised context. [img][/img] In it's current form, it only breaks the revised suggestion that Kagari agrees with.

    I'm not trying to pick a fight or add to a fire though, I only want to say that it calls up a thought. People agreeing and disagreeing is not uncommon, and when coming to a place to express your opinion, it seems sensible. And also gives an idea on how liked or disliked an opinion is.

    Is it really so terrible to hear 'I agree' rather than having to justify it with a different comment or a description of why you agree? Even those two words, though small, can be a contribution to the conversation, as it expresses an opinion and stays on topic.

    That said, if the law of the land says otherwise, so be it.
    I'm agreeing with him because a few posts before his, i saw someone quote something and no words was ever typed. Wow, now why don't i do that to all my postings, quote their posts and click the reply to topic button. No typing involved.

  5. #5

    RE: The Ultimate Sack thread

    i propose if tsunade-sama50 create another thread, we sack him/her/it straight away. oh and for those that dont visit the samurai champloo channel, pls kindly click on it and u'll see his/her/it 's name on 4 thread that (ok i'll start assuming tsunade-sama50 is a chic therefore i shall start refering her as 'her') she had created. and post count?? 4!! four thread and 4 post!! so if she does it again to the stake she goes.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •