Makes me wonder if that also caused the decline in animation quality. When anime used to be elaborate advertisements for the manga, there was more incentive to make the ONE season of the anime as great as possible. Now that the focus shifted to the anime entirely and a longterm needs to be maintained, that possible brought us the shitty, generic animation we now see in the majority of currently airing anime.
"She's the only non-loli girl in the show, your honor!" will be my defense in court
The decline in quality is from the sheer volume of series being aired every season, no other reason.
For the Winter Season (Jan - March) and which is usually the sparse season compared to Spring/Fall:
2024 - 47 series started
2014 - 43 series started
2004 - 19 series started
1994 - 4 series started (for reference: Spring 1994 - 18 series started)
Saying the quality declined is also subjective, because the average animation quality has absolutely improved with notable individual exceptions being a big deal. A lot of TV anime used reused key frames, reused backgrounds, just as many still sequences that people bitch about today.
But everyone remembers the standouts, or actually remembers OVAs as "TV series"
Last edited by Ryllharu; Fri, 03-15-2024 at 11:05 AM.
Eh. Not sure whether I agree with the "average animation has improved". At the very least, the standouts have become rarer. And, I mean, even stuff that didn't look good back then like "Clannad" or ""Ranma 1/2" would be considered great-looking by current standards of animation.
The increase in anime volume that you display is crass, though. Feels like 20 would have been a reasonable number to stay at. Over 40 is just madness.
"She's the only non-loli girl in the show, your honor!" will be my defense in court
Last edited by Ryllharu; Fri, 03-15-2024 at 01:42 PM.