@Kraco: I do think it matters. The whole problem in this debate here is the point in time at which you consider intent to come into existence. I would agree that AFTER Mineta discovered the hole, he formed the intent to take a look through it. Yes. HOWEVER, my argument is that he didnīt know about the hole prior to coincidentially stumbling over it. So the entire situation wasnīt planned, it was not his intent to enter the changing room and peep on the girls. There was not intent at the point in time.
Following from there, I think itīs an important difference that the deity of luck shone on somebody, granting him this chance, and somebody who prepared the situation beforehand (see Youkoso Jitsuryoku for a perfect example of INTENT).
Trying to summarize the whole debate:
- Yes, peeping is always a bit scummy
- But it doesnīt hurt anybody when it happens through a tiny hole and without the intent of using devices to take pictures
- Mineta didnīt get into the situation with intent
- he got lucky and then, having been given the chance, intentionally tries to use this chance
- itīs not misogynistic to think a little peeping is alright
Your level of extremism is, tbh, quite shocking. It really is full-on SJW semantic. You use the extreme of saying "Youīre not in-between just because you didnīt murder some people." No. Iīm not murdering anybody. THAT`S the point. In-between means you can hold beliefs that simply donīt adhere to any extreme ideas. But you cannot see that, for you it is murder or no murder. For me, there is a spectrum that would like something like "nothing - making a compliment - peeping - slap on the butt - intimidation - rape - murder". Thatīs what most people would see, Darth. You donīt. You see "normal - murder". Thatīs why youīre wrong. Thatīs why youīre a SW.Originally Posted by DarthEnderX
Reply With Quote